Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25567 (GAU)

MARU TARO v. NIRANJAN DEORI

I.A.(Civil)/2056/2025 · 2025-12-09

Yarenjungla Longkumer

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010136232025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2056/2025 MARU TARO SON OF MARU TAKIA, RESIDENT OF BACKSIDE AKASHDEEP, P/S. ITANAGAR, DIST. PAPUMPARE, ARUNACHAL PRADESH, PIN-791111 VERSUS NIRANJAN DEORI FATHER OF LATE BIJU DEORI 2:JUNBAI DEORI MOTHER OF LATE BIJU DEORI 3:DEVABRAT SAIKIA BROTHER OF LATE BIJU DEORI ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF GAI DEORI GAON P/S. SILAPATHAR DIST. DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN-787057. 4:MON BAHADUR DORJEE SON OF HORKA BAHADUR DORJEE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BEDATI P/S. BEHALI DIST. BISWANATH CHARIALI ASSAM PIN-784176 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P BHARDWAJ, MR G PHUKAN Advocate for the Respondent : MR A KHANIKAR (R-1,2), MR B DEORI(R-1,2),MR G Page No.# 2/3 BHARADWAJ(R-1,2) Linked Case : RP(FAM.CT.)/0/0 MARU TARO SON OF MARU TAKIA RESIDENT OF BACKSIDE AKASHDEEP ITANAGAR DISTRICT PAPUMPARE ARUNACHAL PRADESH VERSUS NIRANJAN DEORI FATHER OF LATE BIJU DEORI 2:JUNBAI DEORI MOTHER OF LATE BIJU DEORI 3:DEVABRAT SAIKIA BROTHER OF LATE BIJU DEORI ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE GAI DEORI GAON SILAPATHAR DHEMAJI ASSAM 4:MON BAHADUR DORJEE SON OF HORKA BAHADUR DORJEE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BEDATI BISWANATH CHARIALI ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : PLABAN BHARADWAJ Advocate for : appearing for NIRANJAN DEORI Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER Date : 10-12-2025 This application under section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed praying for condonation of delay of 4 days in filing the connected MAC Appeal challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 01.03.2025 passed in MAC Case No.14/2022 by the learned Member, MACT Dhemaji. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant Mr. G.Phukan as well as Mr. B. Deori,learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. This Court has perused the application and finds that sufficient cause has been shown for the delay of 4 days in filing the appeal against the judgment and order dated 01.03.2025. Accordingly, the delay of 4 days is condoned. I.A stands allowed. Registry shall register the appeal and list for admission next week. JUDGE Comparing Assistant