1 APHC010361532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18484/2025 Between: 1. R MANIKANTA VARMA, S/O R. GOPALA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 19-12-42, KESAVAYANAGUNTA, TIRUPATI CITY, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUPATI RURAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TIRUPATI RURAL POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. KANDAPPA REDDY GARI RAJAGOPAL REDDY, S/O K. CHENGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.2- 90/2, RAMAPURAM, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ Of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent Nos 3 and 4 in highhandedly interfering with the petitioners civil disputes 2 pending before the competent civil court and insisting to settle the disputes with respect to the petitioners property of an extent of 2381.16 Sq yards covering three vacant sites situated at Sy No 322/2 of Avilala Village Accounts Tirupati Rural Mandal Tirupati District Erstwhile Chittoor District on the ascendancy of the Respondent No 5 herein without having any power or authority or any jurisdiction and threatening to register false F.I.R on the petitioner despite having knowledge about the adinterim injunction against the Respondent No 5 and others till 25.07.2025 in l A No 179/2025 in O S No 64/2025 passed on 11.06.2025 by the Honble Vacation Civil Judge cum X Additional District Judge Camp at Srikalahasthi is questioned as the same is arbitrary illegal contrary to the wellestablished legal principles apart from being violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14 19 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere in petitioners civil disputes regarding the above subject property forthwith.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the criminal cases have been registered against the petitioner and the unofficial respondents and the police are calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening him to settle the disputes. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on the complaints given by the petitioner and the respondent No.5 criminal cases have been registered and currently under investigation. 5. Considering the submissions made, the police concerned are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station without any sufficient cause and follow the procedure in accordance with law. 3 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 01.08.2025 Asr 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18484 of 2025 Dt.01.08.2025 Asr