M/S VAGISHWARI LAND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/12492/2023 · 2025-03-06
S Sunil Dutt Yadav
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25562 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25562 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9663 WP No. 12492 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 12492 OF 2023 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
M/S VAGISHWARI LAND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT GODREJ ONE 5TH FLOOR, PIROJSHANAGAR, EASTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY, VIKHROLI, (EAST) MUMBAI - 400 079, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR. B. PRAVEEN KUMAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JOSEPH ANTHONY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY.
2.
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HUDSON CIRCLE, N.R. SQUARE, BANGALORE - 560 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9663 WP No. 12492 of 2023
3.
THE JOINT DIRECTOR, TOWN PLANNING (NORT), BBMP OFFICE AT N.R. CIRCLE, BBMP BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.V. BATHE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SMT. V. SPOORTHI, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-2 BEARING JN NI NA YO(U)/PR/220/2023-24 DATED JUNE 12 2023 (ANNX-A) AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE THE MODIFIED PLAN SANCTION BY ACCEPTING THE REQUISITE BANK GUARANTEES FOR THE TDR PORTION OF THE BUILDING AS DIRECTED IN WP NO. 7740/2023 VIDE ITS
ORDER DATED 20.04.2023 (ANNEX-C) AS DONE FOR SIMILARLY PLACED PERSONS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER
In the light of the
order passed in W.P.No.19500/2022 dated 14.11.2024, question of office insisting upon signature of the petitioner on the memorandum for withdrawal does not arise.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9663 WP No. 12492 of 2023
2. Registry to take note of the said order passed in W.P.No.19500/2022 dated 14.11.2024 refrain from raising such objections.
3. Memo for withdrawal reads as under:
"The Counsel undersigned craves leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the instant Petition. Hence, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose the Petition as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity."
4. In light of the same, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12 CT: BHK