Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2556 (HP)

VISHAV BHARTI v. STATE OF HP AND ORS

CMP/32726/2025 · 2026-01-01

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

VISHAV BHARTI Versus STATE OF HP AND ORS CMP-32726 of 2025 in EX.P.-2269 of 2025 01.01.2026 Present: Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate, for the applicant/ petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the non-applicants/respondents-State. Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner fairly states that pursuant to mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, applicant/ petitioner has been granted higher grade pay in terms of judgment rendered in Mohit Sharma’s case, but till date consequential benefits have not been released in favour of the petitioner. While putting in appearance on behalf of non- applicants/respondents/State, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, fairly states that consequential benefits, on account of higher grade pay, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed. Needless to say, consequential benefits on account of higher grade pay, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably within two months from today. January 01, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge