Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25557 (HP)

RAJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/2263/2025 · 2025-09-18

Rakesh Kainthla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Rajesh Kumar vs. State of HP Cr. MP(M) No. 2263 of 2025 18.09.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General for the respondent / State. Perusal of the status report shows that petitioner had joined the investigation and no recovery is to be effected from him. In view of above and nature of offences, the order dated 11.09.2025 is made absolute on the following conditions: (I) The petitioner will not intimidate the witnesses, nor will he influence any evidence in any manner whatsoever; (II) The petitioner shall attend the trial in case a charge sheet is presented against him and will not seek unnecessary adjournments; (III) The petitioner will not leave the present address for a continuous period of seven days without furnishing the address of the intended visit to the SHO, the Police Station concerned, and the Trial Court, and he will furnish his local address to the concerned Police Station. IV) The petitioner will surrender his passport, if any, to the Court; and (V) The petitioner will furnish his mobile number and social media contact to the Police and the Court and will abide by the summons/notices received from the Police/Court through SMS/ WhatsApp/ Social Media Account. In case of any change in the mobile number or social media accounts, the same will be intimated to the Police/Court within five days from the date of the change. The petition stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 18th September, 2025 (Anurag)