K.DHANAKUMAR, S/o. K. Gopal v. The Executive Officer,
WP/13524/2013 · 2025-06-25
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25556 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25556 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010361092013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 13524/2013 Between:
1. K.DHANAKUMAR, S/O. K. GOPAL, OCC: BUSINESS R/O.TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DIST.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATHI - CHITTOOR DIST.
2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DIST.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue direction, order or writ more suitably WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the 1st respondent in allotting a shop to the petitioner as per proceedings ROC.NO. PO1(A)259/AEO(P)ITmI/93, dt. 15-11-2005 is arbitrary, irregular and illegal and violates Ar. 21 and Art. 14 of the constitution and consequently the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to allot a shop immediately without delay to the petitioner and IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 16581 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to allot a vacant shop immediately to the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P V VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS) The Court made the following order:
Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 23.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 26.06.2025 IKN
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 13524 of 2013
Date: 26.06.2025 IKN