Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25550 (RAJ)

LALIT KUMAR S/O SHRI HARMUKH SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

WRES/507/2025 · 2025-09-09

Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36281-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 507/2025 in D.B. Civil Restoration Application No.1176/2024 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.1307/2022 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10364/2016 Lalit Kumar S/o Shri Harmukh Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Saihati, Post Sinsini, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Superintendent, Observation And Juvenile Home, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Bharatpur. 3. The Superintendent, Govt. Infant Home, Child Empowerment Department, Bharatpur 4. Director, Madhav Human And Skill Development Society, 114, Rajendra Nagar, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Munesh Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 09/09/2025 1. This restoration application has been filed for restoration of D.B. Civil Restoration Application No.1176/2024, which was filed earlier. 2. We find that the original restoration application was barred by 128 days, which remained unattended and thereafter, the originally moved restoration application was dismissed for want of prosecution. [2025:RJ-JP:36281-DB] (2 of 2) [WRES-507/2025] 3. The present restoration application has been moved seeking restoration of the D.B. Civil Restoration Application No.1176/2024. The original writ petition was dismissed for not removing the defect(s) pointed out by the Registry within the time provided. 4. We also noticed that even the present application for restoration of restoration application suffers from gross laches and delay of 108 days. 5. Since no cogent reasons are coming forward, we thereto dismiss the present restoration application. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J SAHIL SONI /57