SMT. VANDANA PATHAK v. SMT. RAJSHREE @ HONEY CHOUBEY
CRMP/1355/2018 · 2025-01-10
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25546 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25546 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:1815
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1355 of 2018 1 - Smt. Vandana Pathak W/o Dinendra Pathak, Aged About 35 Years Ward No. 31, Trimurti Nagar, Birgaon, Raipur, Post OfÏce - Raipur, Police Station Khamtarai, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Arti Agnihotri, W/o Durgesh Agnihotri, Aged About 34 Years R/o Shankar Nagar, Post OfÏce - Shankar Nagar, Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Bhavna Pandey, W/o Vinay Pandey, Aged About 33 Years R/o Krishna Rice Mill, Ganj Road, Nawapara, Rajim, Post OfÏce And Police Station Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioners versus Smt. Rajshree @ Honey Choubey W/o Gaurav Choubey, Aged About 21 Years D/o Rajendra Tiwari, R/o New Shanti Nagar, Gorkha Colony, Gaurav Provision Store, Post OfÏce Shankar Nagar, Police Station Civil Line, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Present R/o Through Village Of Amrendra Kumar Singh, Near Hanuman Mandir, Limdihpara, Post OfÏce - Khairpur, Police Station Kotra Road, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kaushik, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Siddharth Dubey, Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order on Board 10.01.2025
1. Heard Mr. Deepak Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Siddharth Dubey, learned counsel appearing for the RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI
2 private respondent.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayer:
“ It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfuly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this application and stay the effect and operation of the execution of the ordre dated 25/01/2018 (Annexure A/1) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raigarh, District – Raigarh (C.G.) in the interest of justice. ”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the trial has been concluded in the present case, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous.
4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the private respondents, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. -
Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Rajshekhar