APHC010361042002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20385/2002 Between: 1. I.KAMESWARA RAO,KAKINADA., S/O. PAPA RAO, TEMPARARY SUB-STAFF (TSS), BANK OF BARODA, KAKINADA. 2. CH. V. CHALAPATHI RAO,, S/O. SURYANARAYANA, TSS., BANK OF BARODA, KAKINADA. 3. B. B.MARKANDEYA,, S/O. YELLAMANDAIAH, TSS., BANK OF BARODA, NELLORE. 4. Y. TRINADHA RAO,, S/O. ARUDRA RAO, TSS., BANK OF BARODA, ONGOLE. 5. B. ARAVINDA,, S/O. SIVE PRASAD, TSS, BANK OF BARODA, ONGOLE. 6. P. BHOOMAIAH,, S/O. VENKAT, TSS, BANK OF BARODA, KARIMNAGAR. 7. P. SANTOSH KUMAR,, S/O. PRAKASH BABU, TSS, BANK OF BARODA, WARANGAL. 8. S.S.MADHAVA RAO,, S/O. VENKATA RAO, TSS, BANK OF BARODA, KARIMNAGAR. 9. S.VENKATARAJU,, S/O. VENKATA POTHURAJU, TSS, BANK OF BARODA, GUDIVADA. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE CHAIRMAN BANK OF BARODA MUMBAI, CENTRAL OFFICE, 19TH FLOOR, NEW STOCK EXCHANGE TOWERS, DALAL STREET, FORT, 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA, SOUTH ZONE, C.P.RAMASWAMY ROAD, ALWARPET, 3. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA, REGIONAL OFFICE, BASHIRBAGH, HYDERABAD- 500004. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring that the petitioners as Temporary Sub- Staff Members, Employed in the respondent bank arenot liable to retrenchment of termination for any reason whatever and that they are entitled to absorption in the bank according to their seniority and other prescribed conditions. The petitioners respectfully pray accordingly besides praying for award of exemplary costs and advocates fee. IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WVMP 3398 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate the interim orders passed in WPMP No.25556/2002 in W.P.No.20385/2002, dated 11-10-2002 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2002(WPMP 25556 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to issue interim direction prohibition or restraining the Respondent- Bank ir any of its authorities from terminating or discountinuing or retrenching them from service on any pretext whatever or from transferring them to any other Branch of the Bank in order to harass/victimize them in any manner whatever without reasonable cause to be made known to them as otherwise they will suffer irretrievable loss and injury after having served the Bank for several long years. IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 33479 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix a date for final hearing of the said writ petition and finally decide issue, otherwise management may invoke the Damocles Sword of retrenchment and to pass such other order or orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 24288 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to withdraw from the above Writ Petition No. 20385 of 2002, otherwise, i will be put toirreparable loss and grave hardship. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 4177 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Writ Petitioner Nos. 4, 5, 6 & 8 to withdraw from the above Writ Petition No. 20385 of 2002 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2009(WPMP 8272 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Writ Petition No.1, 2 and 7 to withdraw from the above W.P.No.20385 of 2002 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. C RAGHU 2. C SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 2. P VENKATESWARLU The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.07.2025 and 24.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners and the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 21st August, 2025 RKS