[2025:JHHC:11081] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.850 of 2024 ------ Farooque Azam, aged about 55 years old, son of Late M.A. Rauf, Resident of Lindsey Market Purana Bazar, Post Office and Police Station- Dhanbad (Bank More), District- Dhanbad … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, having office at Colletoriate Campus, P.O & PS- Dhanbad, District- Dhanbad. 3. The Dhanbad Muncipal Corporation, Dhanbad, through its (Chief Executive Corporation, P.O. and P.S- Dhanbad (Bank More) District- Dhanbad. 4. The Executive Engineer, Dhanbad Municipal Corporation, Dhanbad, having office at Dhanbad Municipal Corporation Campus, P.O & P.S- Bank More, District- Dhanbad, P.O & P.S- Bank More, District- Dhanbad 5. The Assistant Engineer, Dhanbad Municipal Corporation, Dhanbad, having office at Dhanbad Municipal Corporation Campus, P.O & P.S- Bank More, District- Dhanbad, P.O & P.S- Bank More, District- Dhanbad … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Haider Ali, Advocate Ms. Aulia Begum, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, SC I Mr. Sachin Kumar, AC to SC I ------ Order No:-04 Dated:-11-04-2025 Heard the parties. This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of C.M.P. No.688 of 2024 to its original file, which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 02.08.2024 passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that C.M.P. No.688 of 2024 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 02.08.2024 passed by this Court to file requisites for service of notice upon the opposite party Nos.3 to 5 peremptorily, within two weeks. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence, the petitioner could not comply with the said order within the stipulated time, which resulted in dismissal of the said C.M.P. No.688 of 2024. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said order dated 02.08.2024 within the stipulated time was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said C.M.P. No.688 of 2024 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the C.M.P. No.688 of 2024 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, C.M.P. No.688 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list C.M.P. No.688 of 2024 before the concerned Bench after a week. This civil miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/