APHC010361542022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2329 OF 2022 Contempt case U/s. pt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the Respondents herein for willfully violating and disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated 08-10-2021 in W.P.No.23152of2021. Between: Vuanadi Sreenivasa Reddy, S/o V. Murali Krishna reddy, 33y, Occ. agriculture, r/o 3-14, Chabolu Village, nandyal (M), Nandyal District. ...Petitioner AND Sri Bayakati Srinivasulu, S/o. Not Known Aged Not Known, Occ. Thasildar Nandyal, Nandyal District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. ANITHA MESA (SC FOR APREIS TW SW BC) Counsel for the Respondent: SRI T BALASWAMI The Court made the following Order: > A APHC010361542022 sC • IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) • • *.«- [3332] i'- THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2329/2022 Between: Vuanadi Sreenivasa Reddy ...PETITIONER AND Sri Bayakati Srinivasulu Counsel for the Petitioner: ...CONTEMNOR 1. ANITHA MESA (SC FOR APREIS TW SW BC) Counsel for the Contemnor: 1.TBALASWAMI The Court made the following: X ORDER Ms. Anitha Mesa, learned counsel for petitioner, submitted that this Contempt Case has been filed to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order of the court dated 08.10.2021 passed in Writ Petition No.23152 of 2021, whereby and whereunder he was directed to dispose of the representation/application of the petitioner dated 04.01.2021. However, subsequent to filing of the contempt case, it is learnt that the authorities have passed orders on the petitioner's representation and as such the petitioner intends to question the orders so passed by the authorities on his representation. But, by mistake, in the letter addressed to the Registry, permission to withdraw the Contempt Case has been sought, instead of closing the Contempt Case for pursing remedies available to the petitioner pursuant to the rejection orders passed on his representation. 2. In view of the above, since the authorities have passed orders on the representation of the petitioner in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, and as the petitioner intends to challenge the rejection orders passed on his representation, this Contempt Case can be closed. 3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. Sri Bayakati Srinivasulu, Occ. Thasildar, Nandyal, Nandyal District Andhra Pradesh. 2. One CC to M/s. anitha mesa (SC for APREIS TW SW BC) [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. T Balaswami, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies vna HIGH COURT DATED:26/06/2025 ORDER CC NO. 2329 OF 2022 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS