- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1964 WP No. 29119 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 29119 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR SOMASHEKAR S/O LATE GURU MALLAIHA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, HOUSE NO.7, SECOND FLOOR, 20TH CROSS, 33 MAIN, 6TH PHASE, ANNAPPAIAHA LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 078. 2. MR V SURYAPRAKASH LATE RAMAYYA SHETTY.V HOUSE NO.7, SECOND FLOOR, 20TH CROSS, 33 MAIN, 6TH PHASE, ANNAPPAIAHA LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 078. 3. MR N SOMASHEKAR D/O LATE D R NARAYANASWAMY HOUSE NO.7, SECOND FLOOR, 20TH CROSS, 33 MAIN, 6TH PHASE, ANNAPPAIAHA LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 078. 4. MR R GOPALAN S/O LATE RAMAIAH, HOUSE NO.7, SECOND FLOOR, 20TH CROSS, 33 MAIN, 6TH PHASE, ANNAPPAIAHA LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 078. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K SHASHIKANTH PRASAD., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1964 WP No. 29119 of 2017 AND: 1. THE MANAGER, SYNDICATE BANK, BANASHANKARI MAIN BRANCH, BANGALORE - 560 070. 2. MR M.NARAYANA S/O LATE R.MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOTU 53 YEARS, NO 22/1, KATHA NO.7, NEW KHATHA NO.30, SARAKKI VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.M.BALIGA., ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.K.Shashikanth Prasad., counsel for the petitioners has appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus prohibiting the first respondent from vacating the petitioners from their House premises existing in the schedule property. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1964 WP No. 29119 of 2017 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. The petitioners are seeking the relief against the first respondent not to evict the petitioners from the House premises. Such a prayer cannot be accorded in the writ petition. I decline to exercise power under Writ jurisdiction. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12