SUNNY KUMAR ALIAS SUNNY PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8997/2025 · 2025-09-26
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25541 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25541 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:30205 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8997 of 2025
--------- Sunny Kumar @ Sunny Paswan, aged about 20 years, son of Saroj Paswan, resident of village Dundibad, Bangali Para, P.O. + P.S. Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro, Jharkhand.
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner : Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. S.K. Verma, A.P.P.
--------- 02/26.09.2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109/3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR. It is further submitted that the entire prosecution case is false, fabricated and concocted and the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that even the co-accused has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 05.06.2025 in A.B.A. No. 3097 of 2025 and the petitioner’s case is on better footing. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 06.04.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court.
4.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5.
Having regard to the facts of the case and looking the period of custody; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Bokaro in connection with S.T. No. 211 of 2025 (Bokaro Steel City P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 688 of 2025).
2025:JHHC:30205 2
6.
It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 26th September, 2025 kunal/-