1 2025:CGHC:18984 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2082 of 2016 D. Roychowdhury S/o Late Shri H. N. Roychowdhury, Aged About 70 Years R/o Plot No. 264/56, Ispat Nagar, Risali, P. O. Civic Centre, Bhilai, P. S. Newai, District Durg Chhattisgarh And Also The Proprietor Of M/s Stainfab Engineers., Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Industries, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Capital Complex Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2. The Director, Industries, Infrastructure Development Cell Directorate Of Industries, Udyog Bhavan, Ring Road- 1, Telibandha, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. The Additional Director Directorate Of Industries, Udyog Bhavan, Ring Road- 1, Telibandha, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. The General Manager, District Trade And Industries Centre, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rabi Bhushan Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kishan Lal Sahu, Dy. GA with Mr. Shanu Vargis, GM, District Trade and Industries Centre, Rajnandgaon SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.04.29 10:12:26 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 28/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Order 226 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 25.08.2015 passed by respondent No. 4/ General Manager, District Trade and Industries Centre, Rajnandgaon by which lease granted in favour of the petitioner to the property in question has been canceled. 2. Being aggrieved with the order of rejection of lease deed, the petitioner has preferred an appeal against the order of rejection of lease deed before respondent No.2 on 29.09.2015 (Annexure P/6) which is still pending for consideration. This Court on the last date of hearing directed the State to verify the fact and place on record the documents. It is also directed the respondent to deploy some ofÏcers who is well aware of the fact of the case. 3. In pursuance of direction, Mr. Shanu Vargis, General Manager appears before this Court with Mr. Kishan Lal Sahu, Dy. GA would submit that the appeal is still pending in the ofÏce of Appellate Authority. 4. Considering the submission it is directed that the Appellate Authority shall decided the appeal within six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order passed by this Court. The petitioner is not satisfied with the order passed by the respondent authority, he may take recourse under the law. 5. With this observation, the writ petition disposed off. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Santosh