Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25539 (HP)

REENA DEVI v. SANJAY KUMAR AND ANOTHER

CRMPM/2539/2024 · 2025-01-03

Bipin Chander Negi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Reena Devi Vs. Sanjay Kumar & Anr. Cr. MP(M) No.2539 of 2024 03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Roop Lal Chaudhary, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. B.N. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General, for respondent No.2/State. Cr.MP(M) No.2539 of 2024 As per the service report of the Registry, notice issued to respondent No.1 has been returned back after validly served. None has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1. No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of non-applicant/respondent No.2. From a perusal of the grounds of appeal, it is evident that present appeal raises arguable points for consideration. Therefore, leave to appeal is allowed. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Appeal No.________ of 2025 Be registered. Records be called for. Admit. Let post admission notice to respondent No.1, on taking steps within three days be issued, returnable within four weeks. List thereafter. (Bipin C. Negi) Judge 03rd January, 2025 (Gaurav Rawat)