- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22013 WP No. 15231 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 15231 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SIDDABASAPPA S/O LATE. GANGANNA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF KALKERE VILLAGE, , DODDAMUDIGERE POST, THIPPASANDRA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DIST-562131 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR PATEL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 5TH FLOOR, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, THE AC OFFICE, RAMANAGARA-562 159. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, MAGADI TALUK, MAGADI, RAMANAGARA DIST-562 120. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22013 WP No. 15231 of 2025 4. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR THIPPASANDRA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, MAGADI, RAMANAGARA DIST- 562 131 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO R-2 AND 3 TO MUTATE THE NAME OF PETITIONER INTO THE REVENUE RECORDS OF SY.NO. 256 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 4A-28G OUT OF 5A-22G SITUATED AT KALKERE VILLAGE, THIPPASANDRA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DIST. ON THE BASIS OF ORDER B.NO.R.R.T(D) 187/24-25 DTD. 11.02.2025 VIDE ANNX-D PASSED BY R-3 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner in this writ petition has sought for a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to expedite change of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22013 WP No. 15231 of 2025 khata and mutation in the name of the petitioner in respect of the subject land, in terms of the representation of the petitioner dated 20.09.2024 vide Annexure-A. 3. On careful examination of the representation at Annexure-A would indicate that no details are forthcoming with regard to the order passed by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner. In that view of the matter, the petitioner is permitted to make one more representation to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 with all the relevant details to enable the respondent to take decision in the matter. If such a representation is made by the petitioner to respondent No.2 within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, same shall be considered by the respondent No.3 in accordance with law, and appropriate order be passed within three months thereafter. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41