APHC010361462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7687 of 2025 Between: 1. PATHI SUBBA RAMI REDDY, S/O RAMA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O MARRIPALLI VILLAGE, R. KRISHNAPURAM, ALLAGADDA MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT 2. PATHI THULASI ESWARA REDDY, S/O RAMA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O MARRIPALLI VILLAGE, R. KRISHNAPURAM, ALLAGADDA MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY SHO, JAMMALAMADUGU P. S. THROUGH ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI 2. SAVITRI GIRIBABU, S/O SAVITHRI VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/O FLAT NO. 102, NEAR RAS RESIDENCY, PUPPALAGUDA, RAJENDRA NAGAR, CYBERABAD, TELANGANA STATE ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. KODE RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 COMMON ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.3 and 4, seeking to quashment of proceedings against them in S.C.No.7 of 2024 on the file of the learned II Additional Sessions Judge Court, Proddatur. 2. I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are filed by Respondent No.2/Complainant seeking permission to compound the offences alleged against the petitioners, and to record the compromise in S.C.No.7 of 2024 on the file of the learned II Additional Sessions Judge Court, Proddatur District. 3. Petitioners/Accused Nos.3 and 4 and Respondent No.2 appeared before this Court and were identified by their respective learned counsel. Copies of their Aadhar cards attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays to allow the petition by exercising the inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 6. Respondent No.2 submits that he is not aware of the contents of the complaint filed by his father who is no more, and that he was never harassed or wrongfully confined by the accused. Therefore, he prays that the case may be closed. 3 7. Considering the submissions and in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another1, since there is an amicable settlement between the parties, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed quashing the proceedings in S.C.No.7 of 2024 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge Court Proddatur District. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.07.2025 Asr 1 2012(10)SCC 303 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7687/2025 Dt.28.07.2025 Asr