Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25535 (JHR)

MD SARFARAJ v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8639/2025 · 2025-09-25

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:30018 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8639 of 2025 --------- Md. Sarfaraj, aged about 22 years, son of Md. Mustakim Ansari, resident of village Barwadih, P.O. & P.S. Pathalgara, District Chatra. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Sushma Aind, APP --------- 02/25.09.2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 74,75 & 76 of B.N.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and FIR has been lodged due to village politic. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner and the prosecutrix are major and were in consensual relationship. However, when the family of the victim came to know about their relation, they did not accept it. As such, due to the pressure of the family members, the victim has lodged this present case against the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 08.07.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case that that the petitioner and the prosecutrix are major and were in relationship; I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Edith Horo, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra, in connection with Pathalgada P.S. Case No. 29 of 2025. 2025:JHHC:30018 2 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 25th September, 2025 kunal/-