Srirajasekhar Koritala v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/22015/2021 · 2025-06-16
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25533 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25533 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
a IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE j TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 22015 OF 2021 Between: / Srirajasekhar Koritala, S/o. Dr. Pandu Ranga Rao, aged about 51 r/o.,Naperville, I60564, USA, represented by his GPA holder. Dr. Peddaiah. years, Mani ...PETITIONER AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. Andhra Pradesh Non Resident Telugu Society (APNRTS), Represented by Its President, Infosight Building, 4th Floor, S.No. 78/2, NH 16, Service Road, Near Pathuri Road Junction, Tadepalli Guntur District - 522 501, Andhra Pradesh. 3. Amaravati Metropolitan Region Development Authority (AMRDA), Lenin Center, Governorpet, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh-520002, Rep. by its metropolitan Commissioner. 4. Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority (APCRDA), Represented by its Commissioner Lenin Center, Governorpet Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh / ...RESPONDENTS of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution may more particularly one in the
natuc,^ of of Mandamus declaring the action of forfeiture of the paid by petitioner towards the part amount payable for the booking and sale of units in NRTS ICON, by the 211 respondent as intimated through proforma legal notice dated 04-02-2020, as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents repay the amounts of the petitioner along with interest of 24percent p.a., from the date of payments.
amount to petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court be pleased to direct the respondents to deposit the total amounts paid by petitioner the Writ Petition may the to the 2nd respondent before the Hon'ble Court, pending disposal of Counsel for the PetitionenSRI SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2:SRI C SUMON Counsel for the Respondent No.3,4: SRI KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY, (SC FOR APCRDA) The Court made the following: ORDER
■ APHC010360022021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] B TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 22015/2021 Between: Srirajasekhar Koritala ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION i 2.0 SUMON
3. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY The Court made the following:
:: ORDER :: The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.2 in not disposing of the representation made by the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The petitioner addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner further contended that the project in question has been resumed. 3. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, this order will not preclude the petitioner from instituting another writ petition, if a new cause of action arises. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
1. OneCCto SRI. SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR.GENERAL ADMINISTRATION .High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
3. OneCCto SRI. C. SUMON, Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to SRI. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY, Advocate (SC FOR APCRDA)[OPUC] S.Three CD Copies nm
HIGH COURT DATED: 17/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.22015 of 2021 DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS