Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25530 (JHR)

RAKESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./461/2025 · 2025-04-11

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:11290 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P No.461 of 2025 Rakesh Kumar aged about 36 years, Son of Late Ramdev Chandravanshi, Resident of at Sector-3, House No. 21, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Steel City, District-Bokaro. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Kumari Suman @ Suman Kumari, wife of Sri Rakesh Kumar, D/o Late Shashi Kant Sinha, Resident of at Chandak Complex, P.O- Jhumri Telaiya, P.S.-Telaiya, District-Koderma. .… Opposite Parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr-2, Adv. For the State : Ms. Shweta Singh. A.P.P. Order No.04/Dated- 11th April, 2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This application has been filed for modification in order dated 03.03.2023 passed in A.B.A. No. 6681 of 2022 with a prayer to extend the period of surrender of the petitioner in the court below. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner had moved before this Court in anticipatory bail application vide A.B.A. No. 6681 of 2022 and this Court vide order dated 03.03.2023 had granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner and the petitioner was directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of the order, but the petitioner could not surrender in the court below within the aforesaid period. 4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner had no knowledge about the disposal of his anticipatory bail and no one has told him that after disposal of the bail application and there is provision to furnish bail bond before the learned court below. It is further submitted by the 2025:JHHC:11290 Page | 2 learned counsel for the petitioner that after compromise between the parties, the petitioner was under belief that the case of the petitioner comes into end and on such believe the petitioner could not comply the order of this Hon’ble Court and could not furnish his bail bond before the learned court below. Therefore, it is prayed that for the ends of justice, the period for surrender of the petitioner in the court below may be extended by further four weeks. 5. In view of the above submissions, the order dated 03.03.2023 passed in A.B.A. No. 6681 of 2022 is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall surrender before the court below within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. Rest part of the order dated 03.03.2023 shall remain intact. 7. Cr.M.P. No. 461 of 2025 stands allowed. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Amar/-