Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 2025:CGHC:17751 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 333 of 2020 1 - Ajay Kumar Vishwakarma S/o Motichand Vishwakarma Aged About 60 Years R/o Bramhroad, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus 1 - Smt. Jaikunwar W/o Late Devki Sao Aged About 80 Years R/o Village Ajabnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Laxman Vishwakarma S/o Gariba Vishwakarma Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Ajabnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur,
Chhattisgarh 3 - Nansai S/o Manbodh Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Ajabnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sub Divisional Officer, Surajpur, District Surajpur
Chhattisgarh.,
District
:
Surajpur,
Chhattisgarh 5 - Antardhyani Yadav S/o Tirlok Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Ajabnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Trinath Yadav S/o Tirlok Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Ajabnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Anushka Sharma, Advocate holding the brief of Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate. For State : Shri Lav Sharma, P.L. SMT NIRMALA RAO
-2- Hon'ble Shri Justice
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 17.04.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in WPC No.1634 of 2017, the impugned orders dated 14.02.2008, 07.09.2009 and 24.03.2011 were set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) to decide it afresh. She would contend that in light of the order passed in WPC No. 1634 of 2017, nothing remains for adjudication in the present case.
2.
Learned counsel for the State would endorse the submission made by counsel for the petitioner.
3. Heard.
4. Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge Nimmi