Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25529 (CAL)

PRABHABATI NASKAR v. CSTC & ORS

WPA/9518/2010 · 2025-03-07

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29.07.2025 DL-01 Ct. No. 33 Srimanta In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side IA No.:CAN/2/2025 in WPA/9518/2010 Prabhabati naskar & Ors. -Vs.- CSTC & Ors. Mr. Baidurya Ghosal, Ms. Sharmistha Podder, Mr. Saikat Mukherjee, Ms. Anupama Biswas …for the petitioner. The learned Advocate representing the petitioners submitted that the Advocate-on-record had filed the fresh vakalatnama on 11th April, 2025. The averments in paragraph 4 in CAN application being 2/2025 is contradictory to the submission of the learned Advocate representing the petitioners who seeks to not press the application and file a fresh application and the same is allowed. Affidavit-of-service filed by the learned Advocate representing the petitioners be kept on record. Liberty is given to the petitioners to file fresh application. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)