Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25526 (HP)

ANOOP KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/15090/2025 · 2025-09-19

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:HHC:32725 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15090 of 2025 Decided on: 19th September, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anoop Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Shama, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 01.02.2024 (Annexure P/7) seeking applicability of Pardeep Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & another2 has not been 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2CWP No.4254 of 2022 decided on 30.12.2022 2 2025:HHC:32725 ) decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in case of Pardeep Kumar2, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 19, 2025 Judge mamta