Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25523 (JHR)

TANMAY BANERJEE ALIAS TANMAY KUMAR BANERJEE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8340/2024 · 2025-02-04

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8340 of 2024 Tanmay Banerjee @ Tanmay Kumar Bandhopadhyay aged about 59 years son of Late Dili Kumar Banerjee, resident of 166A Bahadur Road Behala, P.O. & P.S. Behala, District- Kolkota-700034 (West Bengal). … … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioner : M/s. Satyam Srivastava, Advocate For the State : M/s. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P For the Informant: M/s. M. K. Sinha (2), Advocate --- 05/04.02.2025 Heard the Parties. Petitioner has been made an accused in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No. 264/2018, Corresponding to G.R. No.1358/2018, registered under sections 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code and charge sheet has been submitted under sections 406/420/174(A) of the Indian Penal Code , pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Garhwa. The petitioner and co-accused persons are said to have taken about Rs.31,49,000/- from the informant on the promise of procuring his admission in medical college. Learned lawyer for the informant submitted that the petitioner is a habitual offender and he is accused in as many as eight cases. He further submitted that the bail application of the co-accused persons has been earlier rejected by this Court. It was finally submitted that the petitioner was granted Anticipatory Bail by Hon’ble Supreme Court with a direction to return the aforesaid amount but he has not complied with the said order. Regard being had to the facts and circumstance of the case; I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is hereby rejected. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Saurabh uploaded