IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14835 of 2025 Date of Decision: 18.9.2025 _______________________________________________________ Raj Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. __________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner states that on account of subsequent development, he has instructions to withdraw the present petition. 2. Ordered accordingly. Interim order dated 12.9.2025 stands vacated. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 18, 2025 manjit 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?