2025:CGHC:25455 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3623 of 2021 1 - Girdhari Lal S/o Shri Shiv Prasad Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Kunkuni, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 2 - Lalit Singh S/o Shri Mohan Singh Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Kunkuni, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 3 - Ramlakhan S/o Shri Gautin Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Kunkuni, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 4 - Kumar Singh S/o Ghasiya Ram Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Kunkuni, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - Shauki Lal Rathiya S/o Shri Bhim Singh Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Kunkuni, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - Kanhaiya Lal S/o Shri Bhagwano Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Kunkuni, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 7 - Mani Ram S/o Shri Ganga Ram Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Kunkuni, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 8 - Lala Ram S/o Shri Bed Ram Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kunkuni, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 9 - Luveshwar S/o Shri Dharmu Rathiya Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Kunkuni, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Raigarh District Raigrh Chhattigarh 3 - Sub Division Officer (R) Cum Land Acquisition Officer Raigarh Block Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattigarh 4 - Salim Sikandar Ekka S/o Victor Ekka Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Semartal, Block And Tahsil Farsabahar, District Jashpur Chhattigarh ---- Respondents REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH -2- For Petitioners : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 18.06.2025 Heard. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that an application moved by the petitioners under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short ‘the Act of 2013’) for apportionment of the compensation against the land acquisition has not been decided by the Collector. He would submit that a direction may be issued to the concerned Collector to decide it expeditiously. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose the submissions made by Mr. Patel. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by Mr. Patel, this petition at this juncture is disposed of with a direction to the concerned Collector to decide the pending application of the petitioners moved under the provisions of Section 64 of the Act of 2013 preferably within a period of 90 days from today. 5. With the aforesaid observation(s)/direction(s), the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha