Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25518 (RAJ)

MAHENDRA KUMAR v. STATE PANCHAYATI RAJ DEP ORS

CW/3003/2015 · 2025-03-19

Sameer Jain

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12551] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3003/2015 Mahendra Kumar S/o Shri Sohan Lal, aged about 31 years R/o House No. 132, Gali No.9, 3-E Chhoti, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, department of Panchayati Raj, government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, department of education, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Executive Officer zila Parishad, Dholpur, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.C Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sara Parveen for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 19/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation within a period of 7 days in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). 2. Heard. 3. This Court directs Respondent/Competent Authority to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide [2025:RJ-JP:12551] (2 of 2) [CW-3003/2015] the same within a period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular dated 19.02.2024. 4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /58