Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25516 (JHR)

DABLU BHAGAT ALIAS BRAJESH BIKRAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5471/2025 · 2025-09-17

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:28600] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5471 of 2025 Dablu Bhagat @ Brajes Bikram, aged about 40 years, Son of Yamuna Prasad Bhagat, Resident of Village Sarauni, P.O. -Sarauni, P.S.-Godda (Muffasil), District - Godda, Jharkhand. ..... … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand. ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vinay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 17.09.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Godda (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 264 of 2019, registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 427, 307 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 26 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the agitation was going on by a mob of 4500 female and 51 male persons. He submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. He further submits that although the petitioner is named in the FIR, however, role played by this petitioner has not been disclosed therein. He further submits that four other named accused persons have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. Nos. 1041 of 2025 by the co-ordinate bench. He further submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-13 of the petition. [2025:JHHC:28600] -2- 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against a mob of 4500 female 51 male persons. 5. Considering that the allegations are there against a mob of 4500 female and 51 male persons and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para- 13 of the petition and further four other named accused persons have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. Nos. 1041 of 2025 by the co-ordinate bench, I am inclined to provide the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today, and in the event of her surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda, in connection with Godda (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 264 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-17.09.2025 Amitesh/-