128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT SADHU RAM AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR Present: Mr. for the SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) CM-6775-CWP This application is filed by the petitioners seeking pre of the main case from 23.05.2025 to an early date. Application is allowed and itself. CWP-6776-CWP Application is allowed and this Court is taken on record as Annexure A CWP-4043-2025 1. This Court, in a bunch of Writ Petitions, bearing lead case i.e. CWP-14627-2024 and Others decided on However, the same would have no impediment in disposing of all these writ petitions as the claim of the writ petitioners has to be decided finally now in terms of the order passed by the Supreme IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 7 SADHU RAM AND OTHERS Vs. HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Mr. Lalit Kumar Narang, Advocate for the petitioners. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) CWP-2025 This application is filed by the petitioners seeking pre of the main case from 23.05.2025 to an early date. Application is allowed and the main case is taken on board today CWP-2025 Application is allowed and order dated 24.04.2025 passed by this Court is taken on record as Annexure A-1. 2025 (O&M) This Court, in a bunch of Writ Petitions, bearing lead case i.e. 2024 titled as Mahabir Singh Tanwar decided on 24.04.2025, has passed the following order: “9. We have noticed the aforesaid submissions. However, the same would have no impediment in disposing of all these writ petitions as the claim of the writ petitioners has to be decided finally now in terms of the order passed by the Supreme IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4043-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 7th May, 2025 . . . . Petitioner(s) Vs. . . . . Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA , Advocate This application is filed by the petitioners seeking pre-ponement of the main case from 23.05.2025 to an early date. the main case is taken on board today order dated 24.04.2025 passed by 1. This Court, in a bunch of Writ Petitions, bearing lead case i.e. Mahabir Singh Tanwar Vs. State of Haryana 24.04.2025, has passed the following order:- We have noticed the aforesaid submissions. However, the same would have no impediment in disposing of all these writ petitions as the claim of the writ petitioners has to be decided finally now in terms of the order passed by the Supreme (O&M) May, 2025 ponement the main case is taken on board today order dated 24.04.2025 passed by This Court, in a bunch of Writ Petitions, bearing lead case i.e. State of Haryana Suresh Kumar 2025.05.12 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4043-2025 Court on 20.02.202 No.2400 of 2024 in Civil Appeal No.3933 of 2023 with connected miscellaneous applications titled as "Union of India and another versus M. 10. them in the Administration into consideration the facts of each case. For the said purpose, we allow the State Government to take decision within a period of two months henceforth as all of the petitioners are already retired and their retiral benefits would be accordingly required to be adjusted and released. 11. any policy respect to the persons, who retired having put in more than six months and less than one year of tenure. 2. The aforesaid decision of this Court shall apply to the present case mutatis mutandis disposed of. 3. All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly. 07.05.2025 Ess Kay 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? 2025 (O&M) p. 2 Court on 20.02.2025 in Miscellaneous application Dairy No.2400 of 2024 in Civil Appeal No.3933 of 2023 with connected miscellaneous applications titled as "Union of India and another versus M. Siddaraj (supra). 10. We, therefore, dispose of all these writ petitions and allo them in the same terms as above and with further directions to the Administration-respondents to pass specific orders taking into consideration the facts of each case. For the said purpose, we allow the State Government to take decision within a period of two months henceforth as all of the petitioners are already retired and their retiral benefits would be accordingly required to be adjusted and released. 11. The State authorities shall also take into consideration any policy decision which the State Gov respect to the persons, who retired having put in more than six months and less than one year of tenure.” The aforesaid decision of this Court shall apply to the present mutatis mutandis. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No 5 in Miscellaneous application Dairy No.2400 of 2024 in Civil Appeal No.3933 of 2023 with connected miscellaneous applications titled as "Union of India Siddaraj (supra). We, therefore, dispose of all these writ petitions and allow the same terms as above and with further directions to respondents to pass specific orders taking into consideration the facts of each case. For the said purpose, we allow the State Government to take decision within a period f two months henceforth as all of the petitioners are already retired and their retiral benefits would be accordingly required The State authorities shall also take into consideration decision which the State Government may take with respect to the persons, who retired having put in more than six months and less than one year of service in their last year of The aforesaid decision of this Court shall apply to the present . Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No The aforesaid decision of this Court shall apply to the present . Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands Suresh Kumar 2025.05.12 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document