IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 14816 of 2025 Decided on: 12.09.2025 Mool Chand and others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Parikshit, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General for respondent- State. : Mr. Dhiraj Thakur, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Having heard learned Counsel for the petitioners for some time and in view of the fact view that the petitioners have approached this Court as pro bono publico because as per them, the establishment of the Stone Crusher is adversely affecting the entire villagers, this petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to file a writ petition on the format of a public interest litigation on the same cause, if so advised. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge September 12, 2025 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?