rf 9 APHC010360062025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) sL. MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18179 OF 2025 Between: 1. Sundari Pruthvi Raj, S/o. Sundari Narasimha Rao, Age 35 Yrs, Occ: Pvt. School Teacher, 2. Sundari Narasimha Rao, S/o, Late Sundari Kotaiah, Age 61 Yrs, Occ: Senior Citizen. 3. Sundari Neela, W/o. Narasimha Rao Age 55 Yrs, Occ; House wife. All R/o. Flat No.714, Block -D, Sri Sri Aero City Apartments, Adibatia, Behind TCS, Adibatia, Ranga Reddy District. Telangana. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, Kakinada District. 3. The Station House Officer, (II Town Police station) Women Police Station at Kakinada, Kakinada District. 4. Mrs Sundari Anuradha, W/o. Pruthvi, D/o. katadi Sathiah Occ House wife, R/o. Police line, Bhanugudi Junction, Police Quarters Kakinada, Kakinada District. Age 32Yrs, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents no. 3 in frequently calling the petitioners to police station and threatening to implicate them in non bailable cases and forcing them for settlement of matrimonial disputes with Respondent No.4 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Art. 19 and 21 of Constitution of India. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 not to harass the Petitioners in summoning to police station without disclosing reasonable cause during the pendency of Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI BABUJI TENNETI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4; — The Court made the following order: APHC010360062025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18179/2025 [3396] Between: 1.SUNDARI PRUTHVI RAJ, S/0. SUNDARI NARASIMHA RAO, AGE35 YRS, OCC PVT. SCHOOl TEACHER, 2. SUNDARI NARASIMHA RAO, S/0, LATE SUNDARI KOTAIAH, AGE61YRS, OCC SENIOR CITIZEN. 3. SUNDARI NEELA, W/0. NARASIMHA RAO AGE 55 YRS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, All R/0. FLAT NO.714, BLOCK -D, SRI SRI AERO CITY APARTMENTS, ADIBATIA, BEHIND TCS, ADIBATIA, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT. TELANGANA. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE vSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHi, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, (I! TOWN POLICE STATION) WOMEN POLICE STATION AT KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4.MRS SUNDARI ANLIRADHA, W/0. PRUTHVI, D/O. KATADI SATHIAH, AGE 32YRS, OCC HOUSE WfFE, R/0. POLICE LINE, BHANUGLID! JUNCTION,POLICE QUARTERS,KAKINADA, KAKINADADISTRICT. ...FeESPONDENT(S): SECRETARY Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.BABUJI TENNETI Counsel for the Respond9nt(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following; ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India v/ith the following prayer for: 2 a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents no. 3 in frequently calling the petitioners to police station and threatening to implicate them in non bailable cases and forcing them for settlement of matrimonial disputes with Respondent No.4 is illegal, arbitrary and violative ofprinciples of natural justice and violative of Art. 19 and 21 of Constitution of India.” Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on 2. written instructions, would submit that, basing on the complaint lodged by Respondent No.4, the Petitioners were called to the Police Station for preliminary enquiry and no case has been registered. For ready reference, the written instructions are extracted hereunder; 3. “There is no criminal case was registered on the complaint of Respondnt-4 Sundari Anuradha w/o Prudvi, D/o Katadi Sathinh, A/32 Yrs, Occ: House Wife, R/o. Police Line, Bhanugudi Junction, Police Quarters, Kakinada, Kakinada District which was perused in Mahila UPS, Kakinada as she and the present petitioner/husband requested for further counseling to leading their conjugal life peacefully In future. ” Sri Babuji Tenneti, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that 4. recording the same the petition may be disposed of. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. 5. However, Police are directed to follow due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- M. PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, Kakinada District. 3. The Station House Officer, (II Town Police station). Women Police Station at Kakinada, Kakinada District. 4. One CC to Sri Babuji Tenneti, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 6. Two CD Copies [OUT] TF HIGH COURT DATED:21/07/2025 *4 ORDER WP NO. 18179 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS