Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25512 (RAJ)

RAJU S/O SHRI PUNYA v. PAPPU

CW/11223/2025 · 2025-07-28

Avneesh Jhingan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:28224] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11223/2025 Raju S/o Shri Punya, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Reta Tehsil Sikrai District Dausa. ----Petitioner-Defendant Versus 1. Pappu, S/o Shri Narayan 2. Ramsahai S/o Shri Narayan, Resident Of Reta Tehsil Sikrai District Dausa. ----Plaintiff/Respondents 3. Smt. Rami, W/o Shri Puniram @ Punya 4. Kajod, S/o Shri Punya 5. Chiranji, S/o Shri Punya 6. Badri S/o Nanga, Resident Of Reta Tehsil Sikrai District Dausa. 7. Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Ramjilal, Resident Of Reta At Present House No.c-19-R-14-T Hats, Moolchand Basti, Rajghat Power House, Dariyaganj Central Delhi. 8. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar Tehsil Sikrai District Dausa. 9. Sub Registrar, Mahodya Sikander Tehsil Sikrai District Dausa. ----Respondents-Defendants For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ghan Shyam Singh Rathore, Adv. with Mr.S.S. Shekhawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 28/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime realising that interim injunction has been granted by the appellate authority and appeal is still pending, is not pressing this petition [2025:RJ-JP:28224] (2 of 2) [CW-11223/2025] with liberty to approach the appellate authority for expeditious disposal of appeal. 2. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. 3. There is no doubt in the eventuality of prayer being made for expeditious disposal of the appeal, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and earnest efforts would be made to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible. (AVNEESH JHINGAN), J Himanshu Soni/30