Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25504 (CHH)

BHUPENDRA KUMAR SHRIVASH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4643/2025 · 2025-06-17

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:25303 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4643 of 2025 1 - Bhupendra Kumar Shrivash S/o Shir Ved Ram Shrivash Aged About 44 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Naveen Loharsi, Block - Fingeshwar, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 2 - Kulanjan Ram Sahu S/o Shri Hemoo Ram Sahu Aged About 35 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Tarra, Block - Fingeshwar, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 3 - Ramdayal Sahu S/o Shri Paltu Ram Sahu Aged About 59 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Sursabandha, Block - Fingeshwar, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 4 - Omprakash Sahu S/o Shri Bahur Ram Sahu Aged About 46 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Kuruskera, Block - Fingeshwar, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - Lokeshwar Prasad Verma S/o Shri Balkrishna Verma Aged About 47 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Tarra, Block - Fingeshwar, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Manisha Thakur W/o Gaindlal Thakur Aged About 39 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Loharsi, Block - Fingeshwar, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 7 - Smt Dhaneshwari Verma W/o Shri Nem Singh Verma Aged About 37 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Naveen Kopra, Block - Fingeshwar, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 8 - Ashwani Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Sakha Ram Sahu Aged About 38 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Loharsi, Block - Fingeshwar, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 9 - Mahesh Kumar Sahu S/o Motilal Sahu Aged About 41 Years Teacher (Lb) Govt Upps Nayapara Bhalesar Mahasamund District- Mahasamund (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.06.18 19:24:20 +0530 2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - District Education Officer Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 18/06/2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners are challenging the impugned transfer orders and action of the respondents, whereby the petitioners have been declared surplus Teachers and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions, and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners, and if the petitioners are not granted interim relief, they will suffer with irreparable loss. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioners have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. Learned State counsel would further submit that if the petitioners are having any grievance, they may move fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization 3 Committee, and the Committee will take a decision on their representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee within a period of 05 days from today, and appear before the said Committee on 24th June, 2025. Thereafter, the Committee shall decide the representation of the petitioners within 07 days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law, in objective manner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved