Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25499 (GAU)

PRIYANGSHU MONDAL v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3570/2025 · 2025-11-20

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010243562025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3570/2025 PRIYANGSHU MONDAL SON OF SWAPAN MONDAL, RESIDENT OF B.P. CHALIHA NAGAR, NEAR NIRMAL STORE, BAMUNIMAIDAM, GUWAHATI 781021, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. PH 7896514222 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : N CHAUDHURY, MR. A BORPUZARI,MS A M DCOSTA,MR A DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 21.11.2025 1. Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners and also heard Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P for the State. 2. By this petition under Section 483 BNSS, the accused-petitioner, namely, Priyangshu Mondal, who was arrested on 06.10.2025 in connection with Chandmari PS Case No. 239/2025 under Section 103(2) of BNSS is seeking bail. 3. The gist of the allegation is that on 02.10.2025 when the informant’s brother was returning after immersion of the Durga Idol, he was badly attacked Page No.# 2/2 by 30-40 persons and brought to KGMT Hospital where he succumbed to his injuries. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the present petitioners are not a participant of the assault. 5. Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the postmortem report reveals multiple injuries on the person of the deceased. However, he submits that there is no incriminating material against the present petitioner. 6. In view of the above as well as the period of detention of 38 days already undergone by the accused petitioner, prayer for bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties ach of like amount to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Kamrup(M), Guwahati subject to the following condition:- (i) That the accused petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court. 8. Return the case diary. 9. The bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant