Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2549 (RAJ)

DR. TAVINDAR KAUR @ SACHI W/O DR. HARIENDER SINGH D/O SHRI SURINDER SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/85/2020 · 2025-02-13

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6405] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 85/2020 Dr. Tavindar Kaur @ Sachi W/o Dr. Hariender Singh D/o Shri Surinder Singh, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Sikh, R/o Surindra Enterprises Main Road, Near Babulal Rungta Genral Store, Brijraj Nagar, Jharsugudha, Orissa ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through PP 2. Dr. Harinder Singh S/o Shri Jagdish Singh, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Sikh, R/o Plot No. 23, Vidhut Nagar-A, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hitesh Jain, for Mr. Akash Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv., assisted by Mr. Amar Kumar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 13/02/2025 1. This crl. Misc. petition has been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 482 CrPC with a prayer to quash the FIR No. 663/2019 registered at Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur (West) for offences punishable u/S 66(1), 66(E) & 67(A) of IT Act. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that after completion of investigation, the police has come to the conclusion that only offence u/S 66A of the IT Act is made out against the accused petitioner, though the said provision has been declared unconstitutional by the Hon’ble Apex Court. He further submits [2025:RJ-JP:6405] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-85/2020] that in the aforesaid facts, the police is now submitting the final negative report against the accused petitioner. 3. In view of the statement made by learned Public Prosecutor that the police is submitting final negative report against the accused petitioner, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this misc. petition. 4. Accordingly, this misc. petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /256