MAMAN NANDI ALIAS MAMAN SARKAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6343/2024 · 2025-05-08
Sri Ananda Sen
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25488 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25488 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:13964 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.6343 of 2024 ------ Maman Nandi @ Maman Sarkar, daughter of Swapan Nandi, R/o 107, Satin Sen Nagar, East Kapte Para Road, Bhatpara (M), P.O. & P.S. North 24 Pargana, District North 24 Pargana, State West Bengal. … … Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Anurag Govind, son of Paramanand Mandal … … Opposite Parties ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhishambhar Shastri, A.P.P.
Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate
Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate ----- 04/ 08.05.2025
Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner, learned counsel representing the State and learned counsel representing the informant.
2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending her arrest in connection with Borio (J) P.S. Case No.293 of 2023, for offences under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 506 and 34 IPC. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had received money from the informant for purchase of the flat but the flat was ultimately not purchased.
4. Learned A.P.P. submits that the notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. / 35(3) of BNSS was issued to the petitioner but the same could not be served because of change in address.
5.
Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner is unaware about the fact that the notice under Section
2025:JHHC:13964 2
41A Cr.P.C. has been issued.
6. Now it has come to the notice of the petitioner that notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. / 35(3) of BNSS has been issued.
7. Since, notice has already been issued under Section 41A Cr.P.C. / 35(3) of BNSS, it is evident that the Investigating Officer does not deem it fit to arrest the petitioner. Thus, there is no apprehension of the petitioner being arrested.
8. With the aforesaid observation, this Anticipatory Bail Application is not maintainable and stands disposed of as such.
9. The petitioner should cooperate in the investigation by appearing before the Investigating Officer.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3