[2025:RJ-JP:32721] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9429/2025 Ramraj Meena S/o Girraj Prasad Meena, R/o Peelwa Nadi, Ps- Malarna Doongar, Presently Residing At House No. 5, Near Dainik Bhaskar Office, Indra Colony, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9431/2025 Pradeep Pareek S/o Lt. Radheshyam Pareek, R/o 13, New Jawa- har Colony, Collectrate Ke Piche, Sawai Madhopur, Presently Re- siding At House No. 6, Near Meena Sewa Sansthan, Sawaimad- hopur, Rajasthan (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Madhav Mitra, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Martand Pratap Singh, Mr. Virendra Singh & Ms. Jaya Mitra For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 20/08/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.119/2025 registered at Pradhan Arakshi Kendra, ACB, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) for the offences [2025:RJ-JP:32721] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9429/2025] punishable under Sections 7, 7A, 8, 11 & 12 of Prevention of Corruption (Amended), Act, 2018. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that co- accused namely Vivek Soni and Poonyaram Meena have already been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Counsel submits that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially considering the fact that co- accused namely Vivek Soni and Poonyaram Meena have been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as co-ordinate Bench of this Court; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners -(1) Ramraj Meena S/o Girraj Prasad Meena & (2) Pradeep Pareek S/o Lt. Radheshyam [2025:RJ-JP:32721] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9429/2025] Pareek shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /108-109