1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1363 OF 2025 1. Akshay Dattatray Bhadange 2. Akshay Suresh Pawar ..Applicants Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another ..Respondents ….. AND ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1364 OF 2025 Sonu Sanjay Sable ...Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra And Another ..Respondents ….. In both the Applications : Shri. Nitin S. Salunke, Advocate for the Applicants Shri. A. B. Girase, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent – State. Shri. Vinod Patil, Advocate for the Informant ….. CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. Dated : SEPTEMBER 25, 2025 PER COURT :- . Since the Applicants are apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.0564 of 2025 registered with Shrirampur City Police Station, Dist. Ahilyanagar for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 49, 351(2), 351(3) r/w. 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, this Application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS’) for Anticipatory Bail. 2. The case of the Prosecution, in brief, is that, on 10.06.2025 while 2025:BHC-AUG:26459 2 the Informant was traveling by rickshaw on Gautam Nagar Road, in order to prevent her from attending the case scheduled before this Court on 11.06.2025, the Applicants assaulted her and threatened that, if she attends the Court on the next day, she would be killed. Since the Informant sustained injuries, she was admitted to the hospital for medical treatment. On the Report lodged by the Informant, the aforesaid Crime came to be registered. 3. Heard Shri. Nitin S. Salunke, the learned Advocate for the Applicants, Shri. A. B. Girase, the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and Shri. Vinod Patil, the learned Advocate for the Informant at length. Perused the papers on record. 4. In the FIR, the Informant names one known person and 3 (three) to 4 (four) unknown persons as assaulters. She stated that she was assaulted with the Bat and also by legs. The Statement of the Auto-rickshaw Driver, in which, the Informant was traveling and which was recorded on 11.06.2025 i.e. on the same day when the FIR was registered, names the Applicants as he knew them. His statement supports the Report given by the First Informant in respect of the assaulters. The Injury Certificate of the Informant, in which, alleged history of assault by some unknown persons is mentioned, shows injuries on the person of the Informant in the nature of redness over 3 Throat, blunt traumas and Wheal marks, though simple in nature. Under such circumstances, though the Charge-sheet is filed, prima facie case is made out against the Applicants and therefore, they are not entitled for Protection under Section 482 of the BNSS. Hence the following order: O R D E R i) The Applications are rejected. ( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. ) GGP Signed by: Gajanan G. Punde Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 26/09/2025 10:38:47