\} IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 7 A -O' M cr,y,j PRESENT the honourable SRUUSTICE r raghunandan rao^^^ Oi f AND THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO: 7a« nF Writ Appeal under clause dated 23 02 2ni« ■ n °rder Between the High Court. ^ 1- M.Kannammal,(Died) W/o Manikyam Naidu, Hindu years, Occ; Coolie, R/o D.No.25-126/A, Town and Mandal, Chittoor District. 2. M.Devaki, W/o Chandra aged about 76 Ramanaidu Colony, Puttur Hindu, aged about 42 n M ntr years, Occ. Coolie, R/o D.Na25-126/A, Ramanaidu Colony, Puttur Town and Mandal, Chittoor 3. R.Mani, W/o.Raghupathy Ramanaidu Colony, Puttur Town (Appellant No.3 was brought on record per Court Order dt.24.02.2025 vi of 2018.) aged about 46 years, R/o.D.No.25-126/A and Mandal, Chittoor District. as LR of Appellant No.1 vide I.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.A.N 0.738 as -APPELLANTS AND 1. The District Collector, Chittoor District 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chittoor. Puttur Mandal, Puttur Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: Counsel for the Respondent Nos. The Court made the following: JUDGMENT SRI L. J. VEERA REDDY 1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE 1 COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at ANIARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) APHC010360262018 IN THE HIGH [3525] fourth DAY OF MARCH PRESENT JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT appeal NO: 738/2Q18 THE HONOURABLE SRI the honourable Between: M.kannammal and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The District Collector and Others Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) court made the following JUDGMENT: (perHon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The in possession of certain extent of land in Sy had sought for grant of pattas of Ownership) Act 1976. The appellants, who were in 198/4 of Puttur Town and Mandal No.125/1 and under A. P. Occupants of Homesteads (Conferment appellants, they approached this not being given to the ofW.P.No.2615of 2006. As these pattas were Court by way 2. The respondents filed a counter in the writ petition contending that the land in question is classified as water course poramboke and grant of house site pattas in such land is not permissible. The counter also states that the appellants had been given 0.02 cents and 0.05 cents in Plot Nos.81 and 82 of Sy.No.186 of Nesanur village of Puttur Mandal on 14.08.2003. 3. Learned Single Judge, after placing on record these contentions i : the counter affidavit, had dismissed the writ petition, by an order, dated 23.02.2018. in 4. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellants have approached this Court. 5. Sri L.J.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants would contend that a survey had been directed by this Court, in the Writ Appeal and the same shows that, the land in question is only Railway poramboke land and not water course land, and as such, patta can be allotted to the appellants. 6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader disputes this contention and contends that the land in question is water course poramboke and pattas cannot be granted in this land. He would also submit that alternative land allotted to the appellants is now occupied and the same cannot be given to the appellants now. 7. Without going into question of nature of land in Sy No. 198/4 and 125/1 of Purttur Town and Mandal, it would be appropriate to notice that 3 € alternative sites had earlier been granted to the appellants and they are now occupied, by others. In such circumstances, this Writ Appeal is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.1 and 2 to take steps to assign/allot house sites to ‘the appellants, in lieu of house sites which had been allotted in plot Nos.81 and 82 of Sy No.186 of Nesanur Village of Puttur Mandal. 8. 9. Needless to say the appellants upon allotment of such land and being put in possession of such land, shall vacate the land, which is presently under their occupation. The said allotment should be completed within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 10. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. . Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// OFFICER SEC To, 1. The District Collector, Chittoor District, Chittoor. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Puttur Mandal, Puttur Chittoor District 3. One CC to Sri L. J. Veera Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]^ 5. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:04/03/2025 JUDGMENT WA.No.738 of 2018 DISPOSING OF THE W.A. WITHOUT COSTS