Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25482 (GAU)

SRI CHANDAN DEKA v. UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.

WP(C)/7213/2025 · 2025-12-15

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010276102025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7213/2025 SRI CHANDAN DEKA S/O - LATE UTTAM CHANDRA DEKA, R/O- AMRIT NAGAR, HOUSE NO-14, BAISHISTA CHARIALI, P.O- KUNDIL NAGAR ,P.S - BAISHISTA CHARIALI, DIST-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-110001, INDIA 2:THE NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY (CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATION) REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER/CONSTRUCTION MALIGAON B GUWAHATI-781011 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 3:CHIEF ENGINEER/CONSTRUCTION -V NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATION MALIGAON GUWAHATI-781011 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 4:DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER(CONTRACT) N.F RAILWAY JOGIGHOPA-783382 DISTRICT-BONGAIGAON ASSAM. Page No.# 2/3 5:STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GHY-06. 6:PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST OFFICE OF THE PCCF AND HOFF ASSAM ARANYA BHAWAN PANJABARI GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 7:DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER DHUBURI FOREST DIVISION DHUBURI-783301 ASSA For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. K. Goswami, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K. Gogoi, CGC : Mr. R. R. Gogoi, SC, Forest BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 16.12.2025 Heard Mr. S. K. Goswami, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. K. Gogoi, the learned CGC appearing on behalf of the N.F. Railway. I have also heard Mr. R. R. Gogoi, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Forest Department. Page No.# 3/3 2. Mr. S. K. Goswami, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that there are some formal defects in the instant writ petition for which he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to re-file by removing those formal defects. 3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. 4. Liberty is given to the Petitioner to re-file by removing those formal defects. JUDGE Comparing Assistant