SUMEET SINGH v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH PRINCIPAL SECY HEALTH AND FW AND ORS
WP(C)/574/2024 · 2025-08-01
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2548 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2548 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 574/2024 c/w CCP (S) No. 185/2025
Sumeet Singh .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Aseem Kumar Sawhney, Advocate
v/s UT of J & K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG Mr. Rahul Raina, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 01.08.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that with the efflux of time, petition has rendered infructuous. Statement of learned counsel is taken on record. The writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, liberty is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to approach respondent no. 4 for seeking fresh registration strictly in terms of relevant rules. In view of dismissal of the writ petition, nothing survives in the contempt petition for further adjudication. Accordingly, the proceedings in the petition are closed and the contempt petition is disposed of.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 01.08.2025 Manik Sr. No. 44