IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1067/2025 Decided on: 06.10.2025 Sulochna Devi ...…Petitioner Versus M. Sudha Devi …….Respondent …………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Afreen, Advocate vice Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J The petitioner alleges violation of directions issued in Sulochna Devi Vs. State of H.P. & Anr. 2 2. At this stage, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 29.09.2025 from the Director Health Services, H.P. indicating the decision of the representation preferred by the petitioner pursuant to the directions issued in Sulochna Devi2. Copy of the consideration order of even date has also been appended along with office instructions. 3. In view of above office instructions and the consideration order, the proceedings in the contempt petition are 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 CWP No.15363/2024 decided a/w connected matters on 08.01.2025 closed. It is for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of her surviving grievance including against the consideration order, in case, she feels aggrieved. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 06th October, 2025 rohit