Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25478 (GAU)

SHIBU BARMAN v. CHANDRA MOHAN RAY AND 9 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/1906/2023 · 2025-12-17

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010268792022 2025:GAU-AS:17589 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1906/2023 SHIBU BARMAN S/O LATE MANGAL @ MANGLU BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POKALAGI PART IV, PO POKALAGI, PS AGOMONI, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS CHANDRA MOHAN RAY AND 9 ORS. S/O DGALU RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POKALAGI PART III, PO POKALAGI, PS AGOMONI, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM 2:SRI PROMANANDA ADHIKARI S/O BATKATAADHIKARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POKALAGI PART III PO POKALAGI PS AGOMONI DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 3:SRI DHIRENDRANATH RAY S/O SAPU RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POKALAGI PART III PO POKALAGI PS AGOMONI DIST DHUBRI ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 4:SRI BISADU RAY S/O SAPO RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POKALAGI PART III PO POKALAGI PS AGOMONI DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 5:SRI SUBHASH RAY S/O SAPO RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POKALAGI PART III PO POKALAGI PS AGOMONI DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 6:SRI NABORAM RAY S/O BANATU RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POKALAGI PART III PO POKALAGI PS AGOMONI DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 7:SRI HAKIM RAY S/O UKIL RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POKALAGI PART III PO POKALAGI PS AGOMONI DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 8:SRI DHAN KUMAR RAY S/O SURENDRA RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POKALAGI PART III PO POKALAGI PS AGOMONI DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 9:SRI DHARNI KUMAR RAY S/O SURENDRA RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POKALAGI PART III PO POKALAGI PS AGOMONI Page No.# 3/4 DIST DHUBRI ASSAM 10:SRI ANIL CHANDRA RAY S/O CHANDRA MOHAN RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POKALAGI PART III PO POKALAGI PS AGOMONI DIST DHUBRI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D K SHARMA, MR. C. CHOUDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S K GHOSH (r-2 to 5,8,9,10), MS F AHMED (r-2 to 5,8,9,10) BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 18.12.2025 Applicant /appellant is not represented today. Learned counsel Mr. S.K. Ghosh is present for respondent Nos. 2, 5, 8, 9 and 10. It is submitted that the respondent No.1 died in the month of August, 2023 whereas the respondent No.6 died about 20 years back and respondent No.7 died about 12 years back. Moreover, on 09.04.2025, a last chance was already granted and an order was passed by this Court that in the event of absence of the applicant, appropriate orders shall follow. It appears that the applicant is not interested to proceed. Thereby this application is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Page No.# 4/4 Comparing Assistant