2025:JHHC:13760 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6124 of 2024 Krishna Kumar @ Krishna Sharma, S/o Chhotu Mistri, R/o Barwadih, PO: Barwadih, PS: Tisri, District Giridih. …. Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Shreya Rana, D/o Smt. Vinita Rana, R/o village Pathaldiha, PO: Pathaldiha PS: Koderma, District-Koderma …. Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K.Sahani, Advocate For the State : Mrs.Priya Shrestha, SPP For the OP No.2 : Mr. Kumar Amit, Advocate ----- 04/07.05.2025: This is an application filed by the petitioner praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of sections 482 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as the petitioner has been allegedly implicated in connection with Complaint Case no.1654 of 2022 for the offences punishable under section 498A of IPC, pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Koderma. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of OP No.2. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of OP No.2 have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 4. Admitted fact is that the case arises out of a complaint. The cognizance has been taken and summons has also been issued against the petitioner. In a complaint case, there is no question of custodial interrogation. The only fact which the court has to be assured of is whether the accused will face the trial or not or whether there is any chance of tampering with the evidence. 5. The impugned order does not suggest any of the aforesaid situations. Since there is no necessity of custodial interrogation, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court below and upon his surrender the learned court below will consider his case as per law. 6. The present anticipatory bail application is thus disposed of. KNR/ (ANANDA SEN, J. )