2025:JHHC:30001 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8630 of 2025 --------- Babulal Yadav, aged about 58 years, s/o. late Arjun Mahto, r/o. village Chanddih, P.O. Kharagdiha, P.S. Jamua, District Giridih, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Lily Sahay, A.P.P. --------- 02/25.09.2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 115(2), 117(4), 118(1), 109, 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and later on Section 103 of BNS has been added. 3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession and in the FIR general and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the named accused persons. The petitioner has been implicated in the instant case on the grudge of previous enmity. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 26.06.2025; as such, he may be released on bail. 4. Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and as such, he does not deserve to be enlarge on bail. 5. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 25th September, 2025 Kunal/-