Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010250462025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3651/2025 SRI DIBAKAR PATHAK SO LT LABA RAM PATHAK, R/O SARUPETA, PO SARUPETA, DIST BAJALI, ASSAM, 781318 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 3 4:THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGER DIRECTOR LOWER ASSAM CAD AUTHORITY CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 781003 5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PAHUMARA RUPOHI DIVISION (IRRIGATION) NOW RENAMED AS BHAWANIPUR DIVISION IRRIGATION SARUPETA DIST BAJALI ASSA Page No.# 2/3 For the Applicant(s) : Mr. H. Talukdar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. Upadhyay, SC, Irrigation BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 18.11.2025 Heard Mr. H. Talukdar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and Mr. N. Upadhyay, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Irrigation Department. 2. It has been submitted that there has been a typographical error which has crept in the order dated 11.08.2025 passed in WP(C) No.1219/2025 wherein this Court instead of holding that the Petitioner has already received Rs.4,78,506/- has held that the Petitioner has received Rs.4,43,353/- and further the entitlement of the Petitioner is only Rs.4,43,353/- and not Rs.4,78,506/-. 3. Taking into account the above, this Court therefore observes that there is a requirement of modification of the order dated 11.08.2025 passed in WP(C) No.1219/2025 whereby the figures have to be correctly mentioned. 4. Accordingly, the last two sentences of the order dated 11.08.2025 at paragraph No.3 i.e. “Out of which, an amount of Rs.4,43,353/- had been duly paid to the petitioner. However, an amount of Rs.4,78,506/- is still due to be paid to the petitioner” shall be read as “Out of which, an amount of Rs.4,78,506/- had been duly paid to the petitioner. However, Page No.# 3/3 an amount of Rs.4,43,353/- is still due to be paid to the petitioner”. 5. Additionally, the amount so mentioned in paragraph No.7 of the order dated 11.08.2025 shall be read as Rs.4,43,353/- and not Rs.4,78,506/-. 6. With above observations and directions, the instant application stands disposed of. 7. The instant order shall be a part of the order dated 11.08.2025 passed in WP(C) No.1219/2025. JUDGE Comparing Assistant