PAPPU @ SARTAJ S/O SHRI BASHIR KHAN @ RAMKISHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/998/2025 · 2025-09-20
Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25471 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25471 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38764-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 998/2025 Pappu @ Sartaj S/o Shri Bashir Khan @ Ramkishan, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Sewada Chungi, Nadan Ka Kuwa, Police Station Civil Line Datiya, District Datiya (M.p.) At Present Shriram Nagar, Ward No. 02, Tehsil Piplada, Police Station Sultanpur, District Kota (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) Through His Wife - Vakira Khan W/o Shri Pappu @ Sartaj, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Sewada Chungi, Nadan Ka Kuwa, Police Station Civil Line Datiya, District Datiya (M.p.) (At Present Shriram Nagar, Ward No. 02, Tehsil Piplada, Police Station Sultanpur, District Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Inspector General, Prison, Jaipur.
2. The District Parole Advisory Committee, Through The District Magistrate, Kota.
3. The Superintendent, Central Jail Kota (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 20/09/2025 This petition is filed aggrieved of rejection of the prayer for second parole. The grievance raised is that the petitioner has suffered incarceration of 13 years 11 months and 19 days including the remission and after complying with the condition of the first parole
[2025:RJ-JP:38764-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-998/2025] surrendered within time, yet the prayer for second parole has been rejected. Learned Public Prosecutor fairly submits that a circular dated 17.07.2025 has been issued with regard to considering the application for subsequent parole where the inmate had complied with the conditions of the earlier paroles. In view of the above statement, the impugned order is set aside. The matter is remitted back to respondent No.2 to decide the application for second parole afresh in accordance with law taking into consideration the circular dated 17.07.2025. It shall be appreciated if the application is considered and decided expeditiously not later than four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. This criminal writ petition (parole) allowed.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Diksha-25