Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25470 (JHR)

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND v. SHYAMA KANT DAS

C.Rev./79/2025 · 2025-08-20

Deepak Roshan

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:24621 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C. Rev. No. 79 of 2025 --------- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. ......Respondents/Petitioners Versus Shyama Kant Das, aged about 66 years, son of Late Ganori Das, resident of Village Amda, P.O. Bada Amda, P.S. Kharsawan, District Saraikella - Kharsawan. .....Petitioner/Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Binit Chandra, Advocate Ms. Deepika Jojowar, A.C. to S.C.-VI Mr. Rituraj, A.C. to S.C.-VI For the Opp. Party : Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate --------- 10/Dated:- 20.08.2025 1. This review application has been preferred by the petitioners herein for review of the order dated 08.05.2024 in W.P.(S) No.3315 of 2018, whereby the writ application was allowed in favour of the respondent (writ petitioner) and it has been specifically held that “the respondents seems to be lingering the matter because in several cases, they have already given the pensionary benefits; as such, in view of the aforesaid discussions, the instant writ application is allowed.” 2. During course of hearing, learned counsel for the review petitioners is not able to point out any error apparent on record of the case; as such, he lastly, submits that this review application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioners 2025:JHHC:24621 2 to file appeal, if so advised. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid submission and looking to the order impugned in the review application, it is clear that there is no error apparent on record. 4. Accordingly, the instant review application stands dismissed with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-