Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25469 (ALL)

SYED MOHD MEHDI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/6670/2025 · 2025-03-05

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:32455 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6670 of 2025 Petitioner :- Syed Mohd Mehdi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mashhood Abbas Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "A. Issue writ order or direction in nature of certiorari to quashed the impugned order dated 21.08.2024 passed by respondent no. 2 Commissioner Azamgarh, Division Azamgarh in Appeal No. C202415000001188 bearing no. 1188 of 2024 under Section 24(4) U.P. Revenue Code 2006 (Ramesh Chandra Vs Sub-Divisional Magistrate Sagadi, Azamgarh and others) (Annexure No.4). B. Issue the writ order direction in nature of mandamus to respondent no. 3 Additional Commissioner Administration Azamgarh to decide expeditiously pending Appeal No. C202415000001188 bearing no. 1188 of 2024 under Section 24(4) U.P. Revenue Code 2006 (Ramesh Chandra Vs Sub-Divisional Magistrate Sagadi, Azamgarh and others)." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that without disposing of the interim application, the order of status quo has been passed. 4. From the perusal of the order impugned, it is apparent that the appeal has been admitted for consideration by the appellate court. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the petitioner can move an application for vacation of the interim order and no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 7. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 8. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application for vacation of interim order. 9. In case, such an application is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad