954 cp 537 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 537 OF 2015 IN WP/4026/2014 Hira Tukaram Sagat VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... • Adv. G. R. Bhumkar h/f. Mr. R. P. Bhumkar, Advocate for the Petitioner • Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondent No. 1/State ... CORAM : N. B. SURYAWANSHI & SMT. VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 O R D E R : 1. The respondents were directed to take decision on the proposal of the petitioner in respect of holiday payment. The respondents have rejected the proposal of the petitioner vide order dated 18.11.2015, thereby they have complied with the order. 2. Petitioner makes a grievance that the order is arbitrary and contrary to the decision of this Court. We cannot go into the merits of the claim of the petitioner. 3. As the order is complied with, contempt petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to agitate his claim in accordance with law. (SMT. VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.) (N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) komal kamble Page|1 2025:BHC-AUG:24402-DB